1. Home
  2. Health
  3. Mental Health
State Mental Health Chief Urges Parity in Treatment

DOLORES KONG

New York Times Syndicate - December 13, 1999

      BOSTON In the first-ever US Surgeon General's report on mental health, the nation's top public health official Monday said that one out of five Americans experiences a mental illness in any one year, yet the majority of those who need treatment do not seek it.

      Hoping this report will do for mental health what previous surgeon generals' reports have done in raising awareness about smoking and exercise, Massachusetts mental health officials and advocates Monday welcomed the 450-page volume as important evidence that mental illness should be viewed as treatable and covered by insurance the same way physical illness is.

      ``People pay attention. . .when the surgeon general speaks,'' said Marylou Sudders, Massachusetts Department of Mental Health commissioner, who attended the White House news conference releasing the report. Surgeon General David Satcher ``gives stature to an issue that many of us have believed in and have worked on,'' Sudders said. ``He has given it this incredible national platform.''

      The report uses the latest statistics and research to argue that the effectiveness of treatments for mental illness rivals that of treatments for physical illness, and Satcher joined mental health officials and advocates in criticizing the lack of parity in insurance coverage for mental illness around the country.

      ``Parity calls for equality between mental health and other health coverage,'' according to the report. ``We have allowed stigma and a now unwarranted sense of hopelessness about the opportunities for recovery from mental illness to erect. . . barriers. It is time to take them down,'' said Satcher in his preface to the report.

      More than two dozen states have passed so-called mental health parity legislation in the last several years, and Massachusetts is the only New England state that has not yet done so. A parity bill was approved by the Massachusetts Senate in October and is now in House Ways and Means, but has met objections from about a half dozen patient advocacy and civil rights groups concerned about its effect on patient confidentiality.

      ``Now's the time for Massachusetts,'' said Sudders, who added that she believes the parity bill as written should pass, while other legislation should be used to take care of concerns about confidentiality. ``There's strong support for this bill to pass. I'm hopeful.''

      Some groups that support parity in Massachusetts object to the bill for repealing the state's pioneering confidentiality law, which limits insurers' access to mental health records. ``We hold back our full support because it is framed in this trade-off language,'' said Paul K. Ling, a Quincy psychologist who leads the Consortium for Psychotherapy, which advocates for quality care and is one of the groups objecting to the bill as written, along with the Andover-based National Coalition for Patient Rights and other organizations.

      Other groups, however, like the Massachusetts Association for Mental Health, throw their full support behind the bill as written. ``It's not an issue for me,'' said Bernard J. Carey, executive director of the nonprofit advocacy group. Insurers say they favor the current version of the mental health parity bill because it allows them to determine whether a treatment is medically necessary.

      But both Carey and Ling agreed on the significance of the Surgeon General's report in calling for breaking down the insurance barriers and removing the social stigma.

      The surgeon general's report reviewed hundreds of studies, many of them published recently, and concluded that while in the United States, ``mental disorders collectively account for more than 15 percent of the overall burden of disease from all causes and slightly more than the burden associated with all forms of cancer,'' nearly two-thirds of people with diagnosable mental illness do not seek treatment. At the same time, the report reviewed the scientific literature on the growing effectiveness of treatments for everything from depression to bipolar disorder (formerly known as manic depression).

      ``The science is so good, the treatments are so well-documented, there's enough there for people to take action and to discuss,'' said Judith Kurland, New England regional director for the US Department of Health and Human Services, who reviewed the report put out by Satcher. ``Usually when the surgeon general issues a report, it's to say, `Here's what we know, here's the state of the art, here's the action we must take.' He's pretty clear about saying, `We have to provide parity and coverage, we have to provide greater access','' Kurland said.

     c.1999 The Boston Globe

Back to the Archives

These articles appear on About.com by permission.  They have been archived from About.com's NewsCenter.  Visit today for the most recent health-related stories.   Do not republish these articles without the permission of the original source.

Explore Mental Health

More from About.com

  1. Home
  2. Health
  3. Mental Health

©2008 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company.

All rights reserved.